Yet another stupid topic based on things I kinda liked about D&D3.+: feats that unlocked spell trees.
Granted, they only worked for Wizards the way they were laid out, but this was something I could kind of get behind: a group of spells with a shared theme at different power levels. You take the feat, and the feat is still relevant a couple levels later because you're still getting new spells automatically with each new spell level, until you run out of spells. It's basically similar to the Domains of clerics, except generally less structured and allowed multiple low-level options.
So how would it be if you had this as the default? You're a mage, you pick two areas with five spells each at level 1, and then you get some miscellaneous spells or spells based on your background/education/ethnicity/etc. And you get to pick new spell trees every couple of levels. Maybe you don't prepare each spell every day - you probably don't have enough memory/slots - but it's nice to have the option.
Buying Spells
Moderator: Moderators
- Josh_Kablack
- King
- Posts: 5317
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
- Location: Online. duh
Workable, and probably more flavorful and easier to track than the base 1-3rd paradigm of "pick anything from 12 pages of spells, then do it again for each spell level you have". You would get characters who shifted focus as in "I started out as a fire acolyte, but now I have mastered time spells" but even that's better memetic traction than having to explain "My spellbook has light, burning hands, scorching ray, flame arrow expeditious retreat and haste"
Gaining new spells from each tree while also gaining new trees is going to be multiplicative power advancement - so the opposition and other classes have to match that.
However I have to ask, if you're going with that sort of multi-themed caster advancement, then why stick to spell preparation at all? Why not go with something more like Tome Spheres or even a bastardization of 4e's at-will, encounter, daily system?
Gaining new spells from each tree while also gaining new trees is going to be multiplicative power advancement - so the opposition and other classes have to match that.
However I have to ask, if you're going with that sort of multi-themed caster advancement, then why stick to spell preparation at all? Why not go with something more like Tome Spheres or even a bastardization of 4e's at-will, encounter, daily system?
Last edited by Josh_Kablack on Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"But transportation issues are social-justice issues. The toll of bad transit policies and worse infrastructure—trains and buses that don’t run well and badly serve low-income neighborhoods, vehicular traffic that pollutes the environment and endangers the lives of cyclists and pedestrians—is borne disproportionately by black and brown communities."
How many feats were there like that? I can only think of the necromantic cyst series.
Vebyast wrote:Here's a fun target for Major Creation: hydrazine. One casting every six seconds at CL9 gives you a bit more than 40 liters per second, which is comparable to the flow rates of some small, but serious, rocket engines. Six items running at full blast through a well-engineered engine will put you, and something like 50 tons of cargo, into space. Alternatively, if you thrust sideways, you will briefly be a fireball screaming across the sky at mach 14 before you melt from atmospheric friction.
- Ancient History
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 12708
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm
Spell trees work from a flavor perspective (Vancian magic) and an option-buying perspective.
Consider the potential options of the wizard versus the sorcerer. The sorcerer is more versatile from a tactical perspective, able to cast any spell he knows as long as he has slots for it. The wizard is more versatile from a strategic perspective, with a much wider range of spells to choose from but the requirement to "lock in" to a certain number of spells each day. Sorcerers, therefore, are severely handicapped if they invest in specialist spells; the spell tree concept hurts them because they have a limited repertoire and so they know how much it hurts to buy spells. Similar phenomenon with the psion.
Ideally you would maybe combine the two approaches - allow characters to buy into spell trees, and those spells are the ones that they can use at-will with no preparation; but the character can also prepare spells ahead of time, if they need a particular effect that is not in their area of focus.
The latter is kind of similiar to 4E's ritual system, but less restrictive and doesn't require a separate subsystem to work out; the at-will/encounter/daily system is even more restricted in number of effects with practically no utilitarian purposes and has no inherent setting basis, and I don't like it on principle.
Consider the potential options of the wizard versus the sorcerer. The sorcerer is more versatile from a tactical perspective, able to cast any spell he knows as long as he has slots for it. The wizard is more versatile from a strategic perspective, with a much wider range of spells to choose from but the requirement to "lock in" to a certain number of spells each day. Sorcerers, therefore, are severely handicapped if they invest in specialist spells; the spell tree concept hurts them because they have a limited repertoire and so they know how much it hurts to buy spells. Similar phenomenon with the psion.
Ideally you would maybe combine the two approaches - allow characters to buy into spell trees, and those spells are the ones that they can use at-will with no preparation; but the character can also prepare spells ahead of time, if they need a particular effect that is not in their area of focus.
The latter is kind of similiar to 4E's ritual system, but less restrictive and doesn't require a separate subsystem to work out; the at-will/encounter/daily system is even more restricted in number of effects with practically no utilitarian purposes and has no inherent setting basis, and I don't like it on principle.
- RobbyPants
- King
- Posts: 5201
- Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2008 6:11 pm
That's true. That one was ass-tastic though. I wanted it to be good, but it just... wasn't.
Vebyast wrote:Here's a fun target for Major Creation: hydrazine. One casting every six seconds at CL9 gives you a bit more than 40 liters per second, which is comparable to the flow rates of some small, but serious, rocket engines. Six items running at full blast through a well-engineered engine will put you, and something like 50 tons of cargo, into space. Alternatively, if you thrust sideways, you will briefly be a fireball screaming across the sky at mach 14 before you melt from atmospheric friction.
- Ancient History
- Serious Badass
- Posts: 12708
- Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:57 pm
Spheres worked a lot like this. I enjoyed those.
Random thing I saw on Facebook wrote:Just make sure to compare your results from Weapon Bracket Table and Elevator Load Composition (Dragon Magazine #12) to the Perfunctory Armor Glossary, Version 3.8 (Races of Minneapolis, pp. 183). Then use your result as input to the "DM Says Screw You" equation.